6
1
0
等級4
333
3
2013-11-29 528 瀏覽
See my full reviews & photos at = http://chefquak.com/2013/11/29/good-teochew-dinner-swa-garden-on-28nov2013/many friends were away. we had a smaller group of 9 for the monthly dinner at swa garden on 28.11.2013. i had wanted to come to this place the longest time but never got to it. had the impression it was expensive but looking at set menus (the one for S$268 looked ok & the more pricy ones included suckling pig), price looked ok.the friend who organised for this evening pre-order 9 ala cart
更多
See my full reviews & photos at = http://chefquak.com/2013/11/29/good-teochew-dinner-swa-garden-on-28nov2013/

many friends were away. we had a smaller group of 9 for the monthly dinner at swa garden on 28.11.2013. i had wanted to come to this place the longest time but never got to it. had the impression it was expensive but looking at set menus (the one for S$268 looked ok & the more pricy ones included suckling pig), price looked ok.

the friend who organised for this evening pre-order 9 ala carte dishes. we started with the cold crab, it was good.
Perhaps no difference from other teochew restaurants like chui huay lim, but good.

the braised duck was good too, “pang” ie flavourful & not tough or overcooked/fibrous.
it said “goose”on paper but they readily admitted it was duck (a 半菜 duck).

the scallop with yellow chives was good, scallops plump & tasty.

& i liked the pot with pig tendon & fish maw, tasty & well done dish
, though 1 friend thought the helping was not large enough for 9pax. i thought it was quite ok.

the mullet was a wet steamed version which i very seldom had..usually i took the air dried cold version at some bakuteh stalls like lao ah ti. i liked this version.
the chye sim salted vegetables were nice & it was easier to pick up the fish meat c/w the dry version but both version had their own attractiveness.

the crayfish was a competent dish, tasty. i still preferred the ah orh style though as i felt the sauce masked the sweetness & flavour of the crayfish.

the prawn balls & ngoh hiang was another average, ok dish.

teochew plain fried char kuay teow was good, had wok hae, though not my favourite. i liked chui huay lim’s seafood beehoon better.

the orh nee was very average, not “pang”. the ones we had recently at much cheaper muliangzai liang kee was better.

overall we had 9 dishes for 9pax costing $297nett=S$33pax. perhaps slightly more expensive c/w with the S$268 10pax set menu (above). price was ok, the food was average to above average. i was not overly impressed but it is a place i would come again for fairly good quality food at ok prices.
129 瀏覽
0 讚好
0 留言
109 瀏覽
0 讚好
0 留言
101 瀏覽
0 讚好
0 留言
128 瀏覽
0 讚好
0 留言
110 瀏覽
0 讚好
0 留言
113 瀏覽
0 讚好
0 留言
112 瀏覽
0 讚好
0 留言
114 瀏覽
0 讚好
0 留言
124 瀏覽
0 讚好
0 留言
(以上食評乃用戶個人意見 , 並不代表OpenRice之觀點。)
張貼
評分
味道
環境
服務
衛生
抵食
用餐日期
2013-11-28
人均消費
$33 (晚餐)
推介美食
  • cold crab
  • braised duck
  • steamed mullet